Physlib

QuantumInfo.ForMathlib.LimSupInf

Several 'bespoke' facts about limsup and liminf on ENNReal / NNReal needed in SteinsLemma

13 declarations

theorem

Existence of a strictly monotone sequence nkn_k satisfying f((k+1)−1,nk)≤y+(k+1)−1f((k+1)^{-1}, n_k) \le y + (k+1)^{-1} given lim inf⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y

Let y∈R≥0y \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} be a non-negative real number and f:R≥0→N→R≥0∪{∞}f: \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} \to \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} \cup \{\infty\} be a function. If for every x>0x > 0, the limit inferior of the sequence f(x,n)f(x, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is less than or equal to yy (i.e., lim inf⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y), then there exists a strictly monotone sequence of natural numbers (nk)k∈N(n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} such that for all k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}, f(1k+1,nk)≤y+1k+1f\left(\frac{1}{k+1}, n_k\right) \le y + \frac{1}{k+1} where the values are considered in the extended non-negative real numbers R‾≥0\overline{\mathbb{R}}_{\ge 0}.

theorem

Existence of a monotone sequence of lower bounds for f(x,n)f(x, n) based on lim sup⁡\limsup behavior.

Let y∈R≥0y \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} be a non-negative real number and f:R≥0→N→R‾≥0f: \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{N} \to \overline{\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 0} be a function. Suppose that for every x>0x > 0, the limit superior of the sequence f(x,n)f(x, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is at most yy: ∀x>0,lim sup⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y.\forall x > 0, \limsup_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \leq y. Then there exists a strictly monotone sequence of natural numbers M:N→NM: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} such that for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} and every n≥M(k)n \geq M(k), the value of the function at x=(k+1)−1x = (k+1)^{-1} satisfies: f((k+1)−1,n)≤y+(k+1)−1.f((k+1)^{-1}, n) \leq y + (k+1)^{-1}.

theorem

If lim inf⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y for all x>0x > 0, then there exists gn→0g_n \to 0 such that lim inf⁡n→∞f(gn,n)≤y\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(g_n, n) \le y

Let y∈[0,∞)y \in [0, \infty) and f:R≥0×N→[0,∞]f: \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} \times \mathbb{N} \to [0, \infty] be a function. Suppose that for every x>0x > 0, the limit inferior of the sequence n↦f(x,n)n \mapsto f(x, n) satisfies lim inf⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y.\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y. Then there exists a sequence of positive real numbers (gn)n∈N(g_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} such that gn→0g_n \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty, and the limit inferior of the diagonal sequence satisfies lim inf⁡n→∞f(gn,n)≤y.\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(g_n, n) \le y.

theorem

If lim inf⁡nf(x,n)≤y\liminf_n f(x, n) \le y for x>0x > 0, then lim inf⁡nf(gn,n)≤y\liminf_n f(g_n, n) \le y for some 0<gn<z0 < g_n < z with gn→0g_n \to 0

Let y∈R≥0y \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} and let f:R≥0×N→[0,∞]f : \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} \times \mathbb{N} \to [0, \infty] be a function. Let z∈R≥0z \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} be a positive upper bound (z>0z > 0). Suppose that for every x>0x > 0, the limit inferior of the sequence n↦f(x,n)n \mapsto f(x, n) satisfies lim inf⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y.\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y. Then there exists a sequence of real numbers (gn)n∈N(g_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} such that for all nn, 0<gn<z0 < g_n < z, the sequence converges to zero (gn→0g_n \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty), and the limit inferior of the diagonal sequence satisfies lim inf⁡n→∞f(gn,n)≤y.\liminf_{n \to \infty} f(g_n, n) \le y.

theorem

If lim sup⁡nf(x,n)≤y\limsup_n f(x, n) \le y for all x>0x > 0, then lim sup⁡nf(gn,n)≤y\limsup_n f(g_n, n) \le y for some gn→0g_n \to 0

Let y∈[0,∞)y \in [0, \infty) be a non-negative real number and f:R≥0→N→[0,∞]f: \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} \to \mathbb{N} \to [0, \infty \rbrack be a function mapping a non-negative real xx and a natural number nn to an extended non-negative real. Suppose that for every x>0x > 0, the limit superior of the sequence n↦f(x,n)n \mapsto f(x, n) satisfies lim sup⁡n→∞f(x,n)≤y.\limsup_{n \to \infty} f(x, n) \le y. Then there exists a sequence of positive real numbers (gn)n∈N(g_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} such that gn→0g_n \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty, and the limit superior of the diagonal sequence satisfies lim sup⁡n→∞f(gn,n)≤y.\limsup_{n \to \infty} f(g_n, n) \le y.

theorem

xk→Lx_k \to L implies gn→Lg_n \to L for block sequence gg defined by xx and TT

Let XX be a topological space, (xk)k∈N(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be a sequence in XX, and L∈XL \in X. Let T:N→NT: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} be a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers. Suppose that the sequence (xk)(x_k) converges to LL as k→∞k \to \infty. If a sequence (gn)n∈N(g_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} is defined such that for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} and every nn in the interval [Tk,Tk+1)[T_k, T_{k+1}), the value gng_n is constant and equal to xkx_k, then (gn)(g_n) also converges to LL as n→∞n \to \infty.

theorem

Existence of a Strictly Increasing Sequence (Tk)(T_k) with Tk≥MkT_k \ge M_k and Witnesses for P(k,n)P(k, n) in [Tk,Tk+1)[T_k, T_{k+1})

Let M:N→NM: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} be a function and P(k,n)P(k, n) be a binary predicate on natural numbers. Suppose that for every kk and every LL, there exists some n≥Ln \ge L such that P(k,n)P(k, n) holds. Then there exists a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers (Tk)k∈N(T_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} such that for all kk: 1. Tk≥M(k)T_k \ge M(k), and 2. there exists some nn in the half-open interval [Tk,Tk+1)[T_k, T_{k+1}) such that P(k,n)P(k, n) holds.

theorem

Upper bound on lim inf⁡\liminf for a block sequence with witness points

Let α\alpha be a type and y∈R≥0y \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} be a non-negative real number. Let f:α→N→R‾≥0f : \alpha \to \mathbb{N} \to \overline{\mathbb{R}}_{\ge 0} be a function into the extended non-negative reals. Suppose we have a strictly monotone sequence of natural numbers T:N→NT : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} and sequences x,g:N→αx, g : \mathbb{N} \to \alpha such that for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}, the sequence gg is constant on the interval [T(k),T(k+1))[T(k), T(k+1)) with value xkx_k. If for every kk there exists at least one index nn in the block [T(k),T(k+1))[T(k), T(k+1)) such that f(xk,n)≤y+1k+1f(x_k, n) \le y + \frac{1}{k+1}, then the limit inferior of the sequence f(gn,n)f(g_n, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is less than or equal to yy.

theorem

Upper Bound on lim sup⁡\limsup for Block-Bounded Sequences

Let α\alpha be a type, and let y∈R≥0y \in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} be a non-negative real number. Let f:α→N→R≥0∞f : \alpha \to \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}_{\ge 0 \infty} be a function mapping to the extended non-negative real numbers. Let T:N→NT : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} be a strictly monotone sequence representing block boundaries, and let x:N→αx : \mathbb{N} \to \alpha and g:N→αg : \mathbb{N} \to \alpha be sequences such that for every block index kk, gn=xkg_n = x_k for all nn in the semi-open interval [Tk,Tk+1)[T_k, T_{k+1}). If for every block kk, the function values are bounded such that f(xk,n)≤y+(k+1)−1f(x_k, n) \le y + (k+1)^{-1} for all n∈[Tk,Tk+1)n \in [T_k, T_{k+1}), then the limit superior of the sequence f(gn,n)f(g_n, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is at most yy.

theorem

Existence of a sequence g→0g \to 0 preserving lim inf⁡f1≤y1\liminf f_1 \le y_1 and lim sup⁡f2≤y2\limsup f_2 \le y_2

Let y1,y2y_1, y_2 be non-negative real numbers and zz be a positive real number (z>0z > 0). Let f1,f2:R≥0×N→[0,∞]f_1, f_2: \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \times \mathbb{N} \to [0, \infty] be functions such that for every x>0x > 0, the limit inferior of f1(x,n)f_1(x, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is at most y1y_1, and the limit superior of f2(x,n)f_2(x, n) as n→∞n \to \infty is at most y2y_2. Then there exists a sequence g:N→R≥0g: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} such that: 1. g(n)>0g(n) > 0 for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}; 2. g(n)<zg(n) < z for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}; 3. The sequence g(n)g(n) converges to 00 as n→∞n \to \infty; 4. lim inf⁡n→∞f1(g(n),n)≤y1\liminf_{n \to \infty} f_1(g(n), n) \le y_1; 5. lim sup⁡n→∞f2(g(n),n)≤y2\limsup_{n \to \infty} f_2(g(n), n) \le y_2.

theorem

Comparison of lim sup⁡xnn\limsup \frac{x_n}{n} and lim sup⁡ynn\limsup \frac{y_n}{n} under bounded difference xn≤yn+zx_n \le y_n + z

Let z∈[0,∞]z \in [0, \infty] be an extended non-negative real number such that z≠∞z \neq \infty. Let (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} and (yn)n∈N(y_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} be sequences of extended non-negative real numbers. If for all n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, the inequality xn≤yn+zx_n \le y_n + z holds, then lim sup⁡n→∞xnn≤lim sup⁡n→∞ynn. \limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{x_n}{n} \le \limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{y_n}{n}.

theorem

Convergence of f(n−k)f(n - k) as n→∞n \to \infty is equivalent to convergence of f(n)f(n)

Let f:N→αf: \mathbb{N} \to \alpha be a sequence in a topological space α\alpha, and let ll be a filter on α\alpha. For any natural number k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}, the sequence n↦f(n−k)n \mapsto f(n - k) converges to ll as n→∞n \to \infty if and only if the sequence ff converges to ll as n→∞n \to \infty. Here, n−kn-k denotes truncated subtraction on natural numbers (returning 00 if n<kn < k).

theorem

lim⁡l(f−a)=0  ⟺  lim sup⁡lf≤a\lim_{l} (f - a) = 0 \iff \limsup_{l} f \le a in R‾≥0\overline{\mathbb{R}}_{\ge 0}

Let f:α→[0,∞]f: \alpha \to [0, \infty] be a function and ll be a filter on α\alpha. For any constant a∈[0,∞]a \in [0, \infty], the limit of f(x)−af(x) - a as xx tends to ll is 00 if and only if the limit superior of ff along ll is less than or equal to aa, i.e., lim⁡l(f(x)−a)=0  ⟺  lim sup⁡lf≤a.\lim_{l} (f(x) - a) = 0 \iff \limsup_{l} f \le a. Note that here management of subtraction is in the context of extended non-negative real numbers ([0,∞][0, \infty]), where x−a=0x - a = 0 for all x≤ax \le a.