Physlib

PhyslibAlpha.ProbabilisticTheory.Classical.UniqueDecomposition

Uniqueness of pure decompositions

i. Overview

When ensembles refine, every state has at most one pure decomposition. This is the uniqueness half of the Choquet–Meyer theorem.

A measure on the pure states is fixed by the averages it gives to continuous functions. We test it on special functions: the largest of finitely many expectation values, `ω ↦ max (ω A₁) … (ω Aₙ)`. Every pure decomposition of a state `ω` averages this function to the same number, the upper envelope of `A₁, …, Aₙ` at `ω`. To see this, cut the pure states into small pieces on each of which one `Aᵢ` is nearly the largest, and glue the pieces with refinement. These test functions and their differences are dense among all continuous functions, so two pure decompositions of the same state agree.

ii. Key results

- `StateSpace.maxApply` is the largest expectation value of a state on finitely many observables. - `PureState.integral_maxApply_eq` proves that, when ensembles refine, a pure decomposition averages the largest value to the upper envelope. - `EnsemblesRefine.eq_of_toPositive_eq` proves that two measures on the pure states giving the same positive functional are equal. This is **Choquet–Meyer uniqueness**. - `EnsemblesRefine.hasUniquePureDecomposition` proves that, when ensembles refine, a pure decomposition is unique.

iii. Table of contents

  • A. The largest value on a finite family
  • B. Integrating the largest value
  • C. Integrating the largest value when ensembles refine
  • D. Density of largest values
  • E. Uniqueness
  • F. Unique pure decompositions

iv. References

- G. Choquet and P.-A. Meyer, *Existence et unicité des représentations intégrales dans les convexes compacts quelconques*, Ann. Inst. Fourier 13 (1963), 139–154. - E. M. Alfsen, *Compact Convex Sets and Boundary Integrals*, Springer, 1971, ch. II.3.

A. The largest value on a finite family

B. Integrating the largest value

C. Integrating the largest value when ensembles refine

D. Density of largest values

E. Uniqueness

F. Unique pure decompositions

33 declarations

theorem

The upper envelope at a pure state ee is at most the supremum of expectation values e(si)e(s_i)

Let ee be a pure state in the state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) of a real vector space EE. Let {si}i∈I\{s_i\}_{i \in I} be a family of elements in EE and MM be a real number. If the expectation value of ee on every element of the family is bounded by MM (i.e., e(si)≤Me(s_i) \leq M for all i∈Ii \in I), then the upper envelope of the family ss evaluated at ee is also at most MM.

definition

Maximum expectation value max⁡iω(Ai)\max_{i} \omega(A_i) of a finite family of observables AiA_i

Given an Archimedean order-unit space EE and a finite family of observables s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} in EE, the function maps each state ω\omega in the state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) to the maximum expectation value max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i). The resulting object is a continuous real-valued function on the state space, denoted by C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}).

theorem

maxApply(s)(ω)=max⁡iω(si)\text{maxApply}(s)(\omega) = \max_{i} \omega(s_i)

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. For any state ω\omega in the state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E), the maximum expectation value function evaluated at ω\omega is equal to the maximum of the expectation values of the family, i.e., maxApply({Ai})(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\text{maxApply}(\{A_i\})(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) where ω(Ai)\omega(A_i) denotes the value of the state ω\omega (viewed as a unital positive linear map) applied to the observable AiA_i.

theorem

ω(Ai)≤max⁡jω(Aj)\omega(A_i) \le \max_{j} \omega(A_j)

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) its state space. For any finite family of observables {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} in EE and any state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), the expectation value of an individual observable AiA_i is bounded above by the maximum expectation value of the family: ω(Ai)≤max⁡j∈Iω(Aj).\omega(A_i) \le \max_{j \in I} \omega(A_j).

theorem

∀i,ω(Ai)≤r  ⟹  max⁡iω(Ai)≤r\forall i, \omega(A_i) \le r \implies \max_i \omega(A_i) \le r

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. For any state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E) and any real number rr, if the expectation value of each observable satisfies ω(Ai)≤r\omega(A_i) \le r for all i∈Ii \in I, then the maximum expectation value max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) also satisfies max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)≤r\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \le r.

theorem

The maximum expectation value max⁡iω(Ai)\max_i \omega(A_i) is attained for some ii

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) its state space. Given a finite family of observables {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} in EE, then for any state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), there exists an index j∈Ij \in I such that the maximum expectation value of the family is attained at AjA_j, i.e., max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)=ω(Aj).\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) = \omega(A_j).

theorem

max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)≤ω(b)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \le \omega(b) for an upper bound bb of {Ai}\{A_i\}

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. If b∈Eb \in E is an upper bound of this family (i.e., Ai≤bA_i \le b for all i∈Ii \in I), then for any state ω\omega in the state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E), the maximum expectation value of the family satisfies: max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)≤ω(b)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \le \omega(b)

theorem

∣max⁡iω(Ai)∣≤∑i∥Ai∥1|\max_i \omega(A_i)| \le \sum_i \|A_i\|_1

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) its state space. For any finite family of elements {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} in EE and any state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), the absolute value of the maximum expectation value satisfies: ∣max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)∣≤∑i∈I∥Ai∥1 \left| \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \right| \le \sum_{i \in I} \|A_i\|_1 where ∥⋅∥1\|\cdot\|_1 denotes the order-unit norm.

theorem

The maximum expectation value of a single observable is its expectation value

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. For any observable a∈Ea \in E and any state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), the maximum expectation value of the singleton family {a}\{a\} evaluated at ω\omega is equal to the expectation value ω(a)\omega(a).

theorem

maxApply(s⊕t)=maxApply s⊔maxApply t\text{maxApply}(s \oplus t) = \text{maxApply } s \sqcup \text{maxApply } t

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space with state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E). For any two finite families of observables s:ι→Es: \iota \to E and t:κ→Et: \kappa \to E, let maxApply s\text{maxApply } s be the continuous function on S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) defined by ω↦max⁡i∈ιω(si)\omega \mapsto \max_{i \in \iota} \omega(s_i). Then the maximum expectation value function for the combined family s⊕ts \oplus t (the disjoint union of the two families) is the pointwise supremum of the individual functions: maxApply(s⊕t)=(maxApply s)⊔(maxApply t)\text{maxApply}(s \oplus t) = (\text{maxApply } s) \sqcup (\text{maxApply } t) where ⊔\sqcup denotes the pointwise maximum in the space of continuous functions C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}).

theorem

Additivity of the maximum expectation value function over families of observables

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space with state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E). Given two finite families of observables s:I→Es: I \to E and t:J→Et: J \to E, let maxApplys\text{maxApply}_s and maxApplyt\text{maxApply}_t be the continuous functions on the state space defined by ω↦max⁡i∈Iω(si)\omega \mapsto \max_{i \in I} \omega(s_i) and ω↦max⁡j∈Jω(tj)\omega \mapsto \max_{j \in J} \omega(t_j), respectively. Then the function corresponding to the family of sums {si+tj}(i,j)∈I×J\{s_i + t_j\}_{(i,j) \in I \times J} is equal to the sum of these two functions. That is, for every state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), max⁡(i,j)∈I×Jω(si+tj)=max⁡i∈Iω(si)+max⁡j∈Jω(tj).\max_{(i, j) \in I \times J} \omega(s_i + t_j) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(s_i) + \max_{j \in J} \omega(t_j).

theorem

The maximum expectation value max⁡iω(Ai)\max_i \omega(A_i) is integrable over pure states

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. For any measure μ\mu defined on the set of pure states of EE, the function that maps each pure state ω\omega to the maximum expectation value max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) is integrable with respect to μ\mu.

theorem

∫max⁡iω(Ai) dμ≤s^(ϕ)\int \max_i \omega(A_i) \, d\mu \le \widehat{s}(\phi)

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E), and let ϕ:E→R\phi: E \to \mathbb{R} be the positive linear functional defined by ϕ(A)=∫PureState(E)ω(A) dμ(ω)\phi(A) = \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \omega(A) \, d\mu(\omega). Then the integral of the maximum expectation value ω↦max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\omega \mapsto \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) over the pure states is bounded above by the upper envelope of the family ss evaluated at ϕ\phi: ∫PureState(E)max⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)≤s^(ϕ)\int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) \le \widehat{s}(\phi) where s^(ϕ)=inf⁡{ϕ(B)∣B∈E,∀ω∈StateSpace(E),ω(B)≥max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)}\widehat{s}(\phi) = \inf \{ \phi(B) \mid B \in E, \forall \omega \in \text{StateSpace}(E), \omega(B) \ge \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \}.

theorem

The positive functional of a measure restricted to the universal set equals the original positive functional

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). Let Lμ:E→RL_\mu: E \to \mathbb{R} be the positive linear functional defined by integrating elements of EE against μ\mu, i.e., Lμ(f)=∫PureState(E)ω(f) dμ(ω)L_\mu(f) = \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \omega(f) \, d\mu(\omega). The restriction of μ\mu to the universal set of pure states, denoted μ∣univ\mu|_{\text{univ}}, yields the same positive linear functional as μ\mu itself: Lμ∣univ=Lμ.L_{\mu|_{\text{univ}}} = L_\mu.

theorem

Additivity of induced positive functionals under domain partition

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let μ\mu be a measure on its set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). For any subset A⊆PureState(E)A \subseteq \text{PureState}(E) and any measurable set W⊆PureState(E)W \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), the positive linear functional Lμ∣SL_{\mu|_S} induced by the restriction of the measure μ\mu to a set SS satisfies: Lμ∣A∩W+Lμ∣A∖W=Lμ∣AL_{\mu|_{A \cap W}} + L_{\mu|_{A \setminus W}} = L_{\mu|_A} where the induced functional Lν:E→RL_\nu: E \to \mathbb{R} for a measure ν\nu is defined by Lν(f)=∫PureState(E)ω(f) dν(ω)L_\nu(f) = \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \omega(f) \, d\nu(\omega).

theorem

(∑i∥si∥1)1\left( \sum_i \|s_i\|_1 \right) \mathbf{1} is an upper bound for {si}\{s_i\}

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space with order unit 1\mathbf{1} and order-unit norm ∥⋅∥1\|\cdot\|_1. For any finite family of elements {si}i∈ι\{s_i\}_{i \in \iota} in EE, the element (∑i∈ι∥si∥1)1\left( \sum_{i \in \iota} \|s_i\|_1 \right) \mathbf{1} is an upper bound for the set {si}i∈ι\{s_i\}_{i \in \iota}. That is, for every j∈ιj \in \iota, sj≤(∑i∈ι∥si∥1)1. s_j \le \left( \sum_{i \in \iota} \|s_i\|_1 \right) \mathbf{1}.

theorem

The Upper Envelope of a Finite Family is Bounded by the Integral of the Maxima and the Sum of Norms

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and {si}i∈ι\{s_i\}_{i \in \iota} be a finite family of elements in EE. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). For any subset A⊆PureState(E)A \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), let LAL_A be the positive linear functional defined by integrating observables over AA against μ\mu, i.e., LA(f)=∫Aω(f) dμ(ω)L_A(f) = \int_A \omega(f) \, d\mu(\omega). Then the upper envelope s^\hat{s} of the family evaluated at LAL_A satisfies: s^(LA)≤∫Amax⁡i∈ιω(si) dμ(ω)+2(∑i∈ι∥si∥1)μ(A) \hat{s}(L_A) \le \int_A \max_{i \in \iota} \omega(s_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + 2 \left( \sum_{i \in \iota} \|s_i\|_1 \right) \mu(A) where ∥si∥1\|s_i\|_1 denotes the order-unit norm of sis_i and μ(A)\mu(A) is the measure of the set AA. In other words, on any piece AA, the upper envelope exceeds the integral of the largest expectation value by at most twice the sum of the norms of the family times the mass of the piece.

theorem

s^(LA)≤∫Amax⁡iω(Ai) dμ+ϵμ(A)\widehat{s}(L_A) \le \int_A \max_i \omega(A_i) \, d\mu + \epsilon \mu(A) in a Neighborhood of a Pure State

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). For any pure state e∈PureState(E)e \in \text{PureState}(E) and any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists an open neighborhood WW of ee such that for every measurable subset A⊆WA \subseteq W, the upper envelope s^\widehat{s} evaluated on the positive functional LA(f)=∫Aω(f) dμ(ω)L_A(f) = \int_A \omega(f) \, d\mu(\omega) satisfies the inequality: s^(LA)≤∫Amax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+ϵμ(A),\widehat{s}(L_A) \le \int_A \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + \epsilon \mu(A), where μ(A)\mu(A) is the measure of the set AA and max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)\max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) is the maximum expectation value of the family ss at the state ω\omega.

theorem

The upper envelope of a non-empty family at the zero functional is ≤0\le 0

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and ι\iota be a non-empty index set. For any finite family of observables s={Ai}i∈ιs = \{A_i\}_{i \in \iota} in EE and any finite measure μ\mu on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E), let LL be the positive linear functional on EE induced by the restriction of μ\mu to the empty set (which is the zero functional). Then the upper envelope of the family ss evaluated at LL satisfies s^(L)≤0\widehat{s}(L) \le 0.

theorem

Upper envelope inequalities on A∩WA \cap W and A∖WA \setminus W imply the inequality on AA

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} a finite family of observables in EE. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). For any subset S⊆PureState(E)S \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), let ϕ(S)\phi(S) denote the positive linear functional on EE defined by ϕ(S)(B)=∫Sω(B) dμ(ω)\phi(S)(B) = \int_S \omega(B) \, d\mu(\omega). Given a subset A⊆PureState(E)A \subseteq \text{PureState}(E) and a measurable subset W⊆PureState(E)W \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), if there exist constants r1,r2∈Rr_1, r_2 \in \mathbb{R} such that: 1. upperEnvelopes(ϕ(A∩W))≤∫A∩Wmax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+r1\text{upperEnvelope}_s(\phi(A \cap W)) \le \int_{A \cap W} \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + r_1 2. upperEnvelopes(ϕ(A∖W))≤∫A∖Wmax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+r2\text{upperEnvelope}_s(\phi(A \setminus W)) \le \int_{A \setminus W} \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + r_2 then it holds that: upperEnvelopes(ϕ(A))≤∫Amax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+(r1+r2)\text{upperEnvelope}_s(\phi(A)) \le \int_A \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + (r_1 + r_2)

theorem

The upper envelope inequality for pure states is preserved under finite unions of sets.

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E). For any measurable set A⊆PureState(E)A \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), let αA\alpha_A be the positive linear functional on EE defined by the integral: αA(f)=∫Aω(f) dμ(ω)\alpha_A(f) = \int_A \omega(f) \, d\mu(\omega) Suppose there exists a collection of measurable sets {We}e∈PureState(E)\{W_e\}_{e \in \text{PureState}(E)} and a constant ϵ∈R\epsilon \in \mathbb{R} such that for every ee, any measurable subset A⊆WeA \subseteq W_e satisfies the inequality: s^(αA)≤∫Amax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+ϵμ(A)\hat{s}(\alpha_A) \leq \int_A \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + \epsilon \mu(A) where s^\hat{s} denotes the upper envelope of the family ss (the evaluation of the state at the supremum of ss in the state space). Then, for any finite collection of indices t⊂PureState(E)t \subset \text{PureState}(E), if a measurable set AA is contained in the union ⋃e∈tWe\bigcup_{e \in t} W_e, the same inequality holds: s^(αA)≤∫Amax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+ϵμ(A)\hat{s}(\alpha_A) \leq \int_A \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + \epsilon \mu(A)

theorem

Upper Envelope Bound by the Integral of the Maximum over a Compact Set of Pure States

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. Let PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E) denote the set of pure states of EE. For any finite measure μ\mu on PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E), any compact subset C⊆PureState(E)C \subseteq \text{PureState}(E), and any positive real number ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the upper envelope of the family ss evaluated at the positive linear functional LCL_C (where LC(A)=∫Cω(A) dμ(ω)L_C(A) = \int_C \omega(A) \, d\mu(\omega)) satisfies the inequality: upperEnvelope(s,LC)≤∫Cmax⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+ϵ⋅μ(C)\text{upperEnvelope}(s, L_C) \le \int_C \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + \epsilon \cdot \mu(C) where μ(C)\mu(C) is the measure of the set CC.

theorem

Finite regular measures on pure states are inner regular

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let PureState E\text{PureState } E denote the set of its pure states. Given a finite regular measure μ\mu on PureState E\text{PureState } E and any positive real number ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists a compact subset C⊆PureState EC \subseteq \text{PureState } E such that the measure of the complement of CC is less than ϵ\epsilon, i.e., μ(univ∖C)<ϵ\mu(\text{univ} \setminus C) < \epsilon.

theorem

Upper Bound for upperEnvelope\text{upperEnvelope} by Integral of Maximum Expectation plus ϵ\epsilon

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E) denote the set of its pure states. Let s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} be a finite family of observables in EE. Suppose μ\mu is a regular probability measure on PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E), and let Lμ:E→RL_\mu: E \to \mathbb{R} be the positive linear functional defined by Lμ(A)=∫PureState(E)ω(A) dμ(ω)L_\mu(A) = \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \omega(A) \, d\mu(\omega). For any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the upper envelope of ss at LμL_\mu is bounded as follows: upperEnvelope(s,Lμ)≤∫PureState(E)max⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)+ϵ(1+2∑i∈I∥Ai∥1) \text{upperEnvelope}(s, L_\mu) \le \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) + \epsilon \left( 1 + 2 \sum_{i \in I} \|A_i\|_1 \right) where ∥Ai∥1\|A_i\|_1 is the order-unit norm of AiA_i.

theorem

Integral of the Maximum Expectation Value Equals the Upper Envelope at the Barycenter

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space satisfying the ensemble refinement property. Let μ\mu be a regular probability measure on the set of pure states PureState(E)\text{PureState}(E) of EE, and let ϕ∈E∗\phi \in E^* be its barycenter, defined by the positive linear functional ϕ(A)=∫PureState(E)ω(A) dμ(ω)\phi(A) = \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \omega(A) \, d\mu(\omega) for all A∈EA \in E. For any finite family of observables s={Ai}i∈Is = \{A_i\}_{i \in I} in EE, the integral of the maximum expectation value over the pure states is equal to the upper envelope of ss evaluated at the barycenter ϕ\phi: ∫PureState(E)max⁡i∈Iω(Ai) dμ(ω)=s^(ϕ) \int_{\text{PureState}(E)} \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) \, d\mu(\omega) = \hat{s}(\phi) where s^\hat{s} denotes the upper envelope of the family of observables.

definition

Set of differences of maximum expectation values max⁡iω(Ai)−max⁡jω(Bj)\max_{i} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j} \omega(B_j)

Given an Archimedean order-unit space EE and its state space S(E)\mathcal{S}(E), `maxApplyDiffs` is the set of continuous real-valued functions on S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) that can be expressed as the difference between two maximum expectation value functions. Specifically, a function gg belongs to this set if there exist finite non-empty index sets II and JJ, and families of observables {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} and {Bj}j∈J\{B_j\}_{j \in J} in EE, such that for every state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E): g(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj) g(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j)

theorem

The set of differences of maximum expectation values is closed under supremum.

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let D⊂C(S(E),R)\mathcal{D} \subset C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}) be the set of continuous real-valued functions (known as `maxApplyDiffs`) that can be expressed as the difference between two maximum expectation value functions. That is, f∈Df \in \mathcal{D} if there exist finite non-empty index sets I,JI, J and families of observables {Ai}i∈I,{Bj}j∈J\{A_i\}_{i \in I}, \{B_j\}_{j \in J} in EE such that for every state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E): f(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj) f(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j) For any two functions g,h∈Dg, h \in \mathcal{D}, their pointwise supremum g⊔hg \sqcup h, defined by (g⊔h)(ω)=max⁡(g(ω),h(ω))(g \sqcup h)(\omega) = \max(g(\omega), h(\omega)), is also an element of D\mathcal{D}.

theorem

If g∈maxApplyDiffsg \in \text{maxApplyDiffs}, then −g∈maxApplyDiffs-g \in \text{maxApplyDiffs}

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}) be the space of continuous real-valued functions on the state space. The set maxApplyDiffs\text{maxApplyDiffs} consists of functions g∈C(S(E),R)g \in C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}) that can be expressed as the difference of two maximum expectation value functions: g(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj) g(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j) where II and JJ are finite non-empty index sets and {Ai}i∈I,{Bj}j∈J\{A_i\}_{i \in I}, \{B_j\}_{j \in J} are families of observables in EE. This theorem states that if a function gg belongs to maxApplyDiffs\text{maxApplyDiffs}, then its negation −g-g also belongs to maxApplyDiffs\text{maxApplyDiffs}.

theorem

g,h∈maxApplyDiffs  ⟹  g⊓h∈maxApplyDiffsg, h \in \text{maxApplyDiffs} \implies g \sqcap h \in \text{maxApplyDiffs}

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let D\mathcal{D} be the set of continuous real-valued functions on S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) that can be expressed as the difference between two maximum expectation value functions; that is, a function ff is in D\mathcal{D} if there exist finite non-empty index sets II and JJ and families of observables {Ai}i∈I\{A_i\}_{i \in I} and {Bj}j∈J\{B_j\}_{j \in J} in EE such that for every state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), f(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj). f(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j). For any two functions g,h∈Dg, h \in \mathcal{D}, their pointwise infimum g⊓hg \sqcap h, defined by (g⊓h)(ω)=min⁡(g(ω),h(ω))(g \sqcap h)(\omega) = \min(g(\omega), h(\omega)), is also an element of D\mathcal{D}.

theorem

The set of differences of maximum expectation values strongly separates points on the state space

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let D\mathcal{D} be the set of continuous functions g:S(E)→Rg: \mathcal{S}(E) \to \mathbb{R} that can be expressed as the difference of two maximum expectation values, i.e., g(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj) g(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j) for some finite non-empty index sets I,JI, J and observables Ai,Bj∈EA_i, B_j \in E. Then the set D\mathcal{D} strongly separates the points of S(E)\mathcal{S}(E). This means that for any two distinct states ω1,ω2∈S(E)\omega_1, \omega_2 \in \mathcal{S}(E), there exists a function g∈Dg \in \mathcal{D} such that g(ω1)≠g(ω2)g(\omega_1) \neq g(\omega_2), and for every state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E), there exists a function g∈Dg \in \mathcal{D} such that g(ω)≠0g(\omega) \neq 0.

theorem

Differences of maximum expectation values are dense in C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R})

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space and let S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) be its state space. Let C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}) be the space of continuous real-valued functions on S(E)\mathcal{S}(E) equipped with the topology of uniform convergence. Let D\mathcal{D} be the set of functions g:S(E)→Rg: \mathcal{S}(E) \to \mathbb{R} of the form g(ω)=max⁡i∈Iω(Ai)−max⁡j∈Jω(Bj) g(\omega) = \max_{i \in I} \omega(A_i) - \max_{j \in J} \omega(B_j) where II and JJ are finite non-empty index sets and Ai,Bj∈EA_i, B_j \in E are observables. Then the topological closure of D\mathcal{D} is the entire space C(S(E),R)C(\mathcal{S}(E), \mathbb{R}). That is, the differences of maximum expectation values are dense among continuous functions on the state space.

theorem

Measures on pure states with the same resultant functional have equal integrals for all g∈C(stateSpace E,R)g \in C(\text{stateSpace } E, \mathbb{R})

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space with state space stateSpace(E)\text{stateSpace}(E). Let μ\mu and ν\nu be finite measures on the set of pure states PureState(E)⊆stateSpace(E)\text{PureState}(E) \subseteq \text{stateSpace}(E). If μ\mu and ν\nu represent the same positive linear functional on EE (i.e., toPositive μ=toPositive ν\text{toPositive } \mu = \text{toPositive } \nu, meaning ∫ω(A) dμ(ω)=∫ω(A) dν(ω)\int \omega(A) \, d\mu(\omega) = \int \omega(A) \, d\nu(\omega) for all A∈EA \in E), then for any continuous function g:stateSpace(E)→Rg: \text{stateSpace}(E) \to \mathbb{R}, the integral of gg with respect to the pushforward of μ\mu to the state space equals the integral of gg with respect to the pushforward of ν\nu: ∫stateSpace(E)g(ω) d(ι∗μ)(ω)=∫stateSpace(E)g(ω) d(ι∗ν)(ω)\int_{\text{stateSpace}(E)} g(\omega) \, d(\iota_* \mu)(\omega) = \int_{\text{stateSpace}(E)} g(\omega) \, d(\iota_* \nu)(\omega) where ι:PureState(E)↪stateSpace(E)\iota: \text{PureState}(E) \hookrightarrow \text{stateSpace}(E) is the inclusion map.

theorem

Ensemble refinement implies uniqueness of pure decompositions (Choquet–Meyer uniqueness)

Let EE be an Archimedean order-unit space. Suppose EE satisfies the ensemble refinement property, meaning that for any two finite families of positive linear functionals {αi}i∈I\{\alpha_i\}_{i \in \mathcal{I}} and {βj}j∈J\{\beta_j\}_{j \in \mathcal{J}} on EE such that ∑i∈Iαi=∑j∈Jβj\sum_{i \in \mathcal{I}} \alpha_i = \sum_{j \in \mathcal{J}} \beta_j, there exists a common refinement {γij}i∈I,j∈J\{\gamma_{ij}\}_{i \in \mathcal{I}, j \in \mathcal{J}}. If a state ω∈S(E)\omega \in \mathcal{S}(E) has a pure decomposition (i.e., there exists a regular probability measure μ\mu on the set of pure states of EE such that ω(f)=∫PureState Eϕ(f) dμ(ϕ)\omega(f) = \int_{\text{PureState } E} \phi(f) \, d\mu(\phi) for all f∈Ef \in E), then this decomposition is unique.