Physlib

PhyslibAlpha.ProbabilisticTheory.Classical.Nuclear

Classical systems are nuclear

i. Overview

A classical system composes uniquely with every other system: every composite observable in the maximal cone is, up to an arbitrarily small multiple of the unit, a sum of products of nonnegative observables. Together with the converse, a system is classical exactly when it is nuclear. This is the theorem of Namioka and Phelps.

The proof measures and prepares. In the bidual of a classical system, finitely many observables are close to step functions on a partition of the unit. Each piece of the partition is detected by a state of the system. Measuring with these states and preparing the pieces approximates the observables, and applied to a composite observable in the maximal cone it produces nonnegative products. A positive functional on the minimal cone therefore cannot separate a maximal-cone observable from the minimal cone.

ii. Key results

- `Bidual.hasMonotoneSups` : increasing sequences in the bidual have least upper bounds. - `Bidual.exists_apply_ge` : every nonzero piece of the unit is detected by a state. - `Bidual.exists_measure_prepare` : finitely many elements of the bidual of a classical system are approximated by measuring with states and preparing pieces of the unit. - `Nuclear.apply_nonneg_of_mem_maxTensorCone` : for a classical system, a functional nonnegative on the minimal cone is nonnegative on the maximal cone. - `IsClassical.isNuclear` : classical systems are nuclear. - `isClassical_iff_isNuclear` : **Namioka–Phelps**: a system is classical exactly when it is nuclear.

iii. Table of contents

  • A. Monotone suprema and detection
  • B. Measure and prepare
  • C. Positive functionals on the minimal cone
  • D. Positive functionals on the minimal cone are positive on the maximal cone
  • E. Classical systems are nuclear

iv. References

- I. Namioka and R. R. Phelps, *Tensor products of compact convex sets*, Pacific J. Math. 31 (1969), 469–480.

A. Monotone suprema and detection

B. Measure and prepare

C. Positive functionals on the minimal cone

D. Positive functionals on the minimal cone are positive on the maximal cone

E. Classical systems are nuclear

22 declarations

theorem

Increasing sequences below the unit in the bidual have least upper bounds

Let EE be an order-unit space and let Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E) be its bidual space. For any sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} in Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E) that is monotonically increasing (xn≤xn+1x_n \le x_{n+1} for all nn) and bounded above by the order unit 11 (xn≤1x_n \le 1 for all nn), the least upper bound sup⁡n∈Nxn\sup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} x_n exists in Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E).

theorem

Every nonzero piece of the unit is detected by a state

Let EE be an order-unit space and E∗∗E^{**} denote its bidual space with order unit 11. Suppose c∈E∗∗c \in E^{**} is a non-zero positive element (c≥0,c≠0c \ge 0, c \neq 0) that is disjoint from its complement in the sense that c∧(1−c)=0c \wedge (1 - c) = 0. For any θ>0\theta > 0, there exists a state ϕ\phi on EE (a positive linear functional such that ϕ(1)=1\phi(1) = 1) such that the evaluation of cc at ϕ\phi satisfies c(ϕ)≥1−θc(\phi) \ge 1 - \theta.

theorem

Existence of states detecting pieces of a partition of the unit in the bidual space

Let EE be an order-unit space and Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E) be its bidual space. Suppose s={si}i∈Is = \{s_i\}_{i \in I} is a partition of the unit 11 in Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E). For any θ>0\theta > 0, there exists a family of states {ϕi}i∈I\{\phi_i\}_{i \in I} (where each ϕi\phi_i is a positive linear functional on EE satisfying ϕi(1)=1\phi_i(1) = 1) such that for every index ii where si≠0s_i \neq 0, the action of the bidual element sis_i on the state ϕi\phi_i satisfies si(ϕi)≥1−θs_i(\phi_i) \geq 1 - \theta.

theorem

Linearity of state evaluation for linear combinations in the bidual: (∑icisi)(ϕ)=∑ici(si(ϕ))(\sum_i c_i s_i)(\phi) = \sum_i c_i (s_i(\phi))

Let EE be a physical system and E∗∗E^{**} denote its bidual. For a collection of observables si∈E∗∗s_i \in E^{**} and real coefficients ci∈Rc_i \in \mathbb{R}, let ∑icisi\sum_i c_i s_i be a linear combination (referred to as a step function in this context). For any state ϕ\phi of the system, the evaluation of this sum at ϕ\phi is equal to the linear combination of the individual evaluations: (∑icisi)(ϕ)=∑ici(si(ϕ))\left( \sum_i c_i s_i \right)(\phi) = \sum_i c_i (s_i(\phi)) where the pairing (⋅)(ϕ)(\cdot)(\phi) represents the action of the bidual element on the state.

theorem

(∑isi)(ϕ)=∑isi(ϕ)(\sum_i s_i)(\phi) = \sum_i s_i(\phi)

For any finite family of elements {si}i∈I\{s_i\}_{i \in I} in the bidual space E∗∗E^{**} and any positive linear functional ϕ\phi on EE, the evaluation of the sum ∑i∈Isi\sum_{i \in I} s_i at ϕ\phi is equal to the sum of the individual evaluations: (∑i∈Isi)(ϕ)=∑i∈Isi(ϕ) \left( \sum_{i \in I} s_i \right)(\phi) = \sum_{i \in I} s_i(\phi)

theorem

The value x(ϕ)x(\phi) is bounded by the local levels ai,bia_i, b_i at a state detecting the piece sis_i

Let EE be an order-unit space and E∗∗E^{**} its bidual. Let {si}i∈I\{s_i\}_{i \in I} be a partition of the unit 1∈E∗∗1 \in E^{**} and let x∈E∗∗x \in E^{**} be an observable in the bidual. Suppose xx is bounded between two step functions such that ∑j∈Iajsj≤x≤∑j∈Ibjsj\sum_{j \in I} a_j s_j \le x \le \sum_{j \in I} b_j s_j for some real coefficients aj,bja_j, b_j that are all bounded in absolute value by AA (i.e., ∣al∣≤A|a_l| \le A and ∣bl∣≤A|b_l| \le A for all l∈Il \in I). If ϕ\phi is a normalized state (ϕ(1)=1\phi(1) = 1) that detects the ii-th piece of the partition with error θ\theta (meaning si(ϕ)≥1−θs_i(\phi) \ge 1 - \theta), then the evaluation of xx at the state ϕ\phi is bounded by: ai−2Aθ≤x(ϕ)≤bi+2Aθa_i - 2A\theta \le x(\phi) \le b_i + 2A\theta

theorem

Existence of a Uniform Bound for Finitely Many Values and their Shifts

For any finite collection of real numbers ai,ka_{i,k} (where i∈{0,…,m−1}i \in \{0, \dots, m-1\} and k∈{0,…,n−1}k \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}) and any real constant cc, there exists a non-negative real number AA such that for all indices ii and kk, the absolute values of both ai,ka_{i,k} and the shifted values ai,k+ca_{i,k} + c are bounded by AA, i.e., ∣ai,k∣≤A|a_{i,k}| \le A and ∣ai,k+c∣≤A|a_{i,k} + c| \le A.

theorem

Existence of a small error parameter θ>0\theta > 0 such that 2Aθ≤η/42 A \theta \le \eta/4

For any positive real number η>0\eta > 0 and any non-negative real number A≥0A \ge 0, there exists a positive real number θ>0\theta > 0 such that 2Aθ≤η42 A \theta \le \frac{\eta}{4}. This θ\theta serves as a detection error parameter in approximation arguments.

theorem

Existence of a Measure-and-Prepare Approximation in the Bidual of a Classical System

Let EE be a classical order-unit space and let Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E) be its bidual space. Given a finite collection of elements x1,…,xn∈Bidual(E)x_1, \dots, x_n \in \text{Bidual}(E) and a positive real number η>0\eta > 0, there exists a finite number mm, a set of non-negative elements p1,…,pm∈Bidual(E)p_1, \dots, p_m \in \text{Bidual}(E) forming a partition of the unit (i.e., ∑i=1mpi=1\sum_{i=1}^m p_i = 1), and a set of states φ1,…,φm\varphi_1, \dots, \varphi_m on EE such that for each k∈{1,…,n}k \in \{1, \dots, n\}, the following inequality holds: −η⋅1≤xk−∑i=1m⟨xk,φi⟩pi≤η⋅1 -\eta \cdot 1 \le x_k - \sum_{i=1}^m \langle x_k, \varphi_i \rangle p_i \le \eta \cdot 1 where ⟨xk,φi⟩\langle x_k, \varphi_i \rangle denotes the natural pairing between the bidual element xkx_k and the state φi\varphi_i, and 11 is the order unit of the bidual space.

definition

The positive functional x↦Λ(x⊗y)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes y) on EE for y≥0y \ge 0

Given ordered real vector spaces EE and FF, and a linear functional Λ:E⊗F→R\Lambda: E \otimes F \to \mathbb{R} that is positive on the minimal tensor cone, for any fixed non-negative element y∈Fy \in F (y≥0y \ge 0), the `slice` is the positive linear functional on EE mapping xx to Λ(x⊗y)\Lambda(x \otimes y).

theorem

The value of the slice functional slice(Λ,y)\text{slice}(\Lambda, y) at xx is Λ(x⊗y)\Lambda(x \otimes y)

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces. Let Λ:E⊗RF→R\Lambda : E \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is positive on the minimal tensor cone. For any non-negative element y∈Fy \in F (where y≥0y \ge 0) and any element x∈Ex \in E, the value of the positive functional slice(Λ,y)\text{slice}(\Lambda, y) applied to xx is equal to Λ(x⊗y)\Lambda(x \otimes y).

theorem

Additivity of the Slice Functional: Sy+y′=Sy+Sy′S_{y+y'} = S_y + S_{y'}

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces and let Λ:E⊗F→R\Lambda: E \otimes F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is non-negative on the minimal tensor cone. For any non-negative element y∈Fy \in F, let the "slice" be the linear functional on EE defined by x↦Λ(x⊗y)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes y). Then for any non-negative elements y,y′∈Fy, y' \in F, the slice associated with the sum y+y′y + y' is equal to the sum of the slice associated with yy and the slice associated with y′y'.

theorem

slice(c⋅y)=c⋅slice(y)\text{slice}(c \cdot y) = c \cdot \text{slice}(y) for c,y≥0c, y \ge 0

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces and let Λ:E⊗RF→R\Lambda: E \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is non-negative on the minimal tensor cone. For any y∈Fy \in F with y≥0y \ge 0, let slice(y)\text{slice}(y) be the positive linear functional on EE defined by x↦Λ(x⊗y)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes y). For any scalar c∈Rc \in \mathbb{R} such that c≥0c \ge 0 and any y∈Fy \in F such that y≥0y \ge 0, it holds that slice(c⋅y)=c⋅slice(y).\text{slice}(c \cdot y) = c \cdot \text{slice}(y).

definition

Positive functional on FF induced by p∈E∗∗p \in E^{**} and Λ\Lambda

Given a linear functional Λ:E⊗F→R\Lambda: E \otimes F \to \mathbb{R} that is positive on the minimal tensor cone, the function `Nuclear.pairing` maps a non-negative element pp of the bidual E∗∗E^{**} to a positive linear functional on FF. For any y≥0y \ge 0 in FF, the value of the resulting functional is p(ϕy)p(\phi_y), where ϕy:E→R\phi_y: E \to \mathbb{R} is the positive linear functional defined by ϕy(x)=Λ(x⊗y)\phi_y(x) = \Lambda(x \otimes y).

theorem

pairing(p)(y)=p(slice(y))\text{pairing}(p)(y) = p(\text{slice}(y)) for non-negative pp and yy

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces and let Λ:E⊗RF→R\Lambda: E \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is non-negative on the minimal tensor cone. For any non-negative element pp in the bidual E∗∗E^{**} and any non-negative element y∈Fy \in F, the value of the positive linear functional pairing(p)\text{pairing}(p) at yy is equal to the result of evaluating pp on the functional slice(y)\text{slice}(y). That is, pairing(p)(y)=p(slice(y)),\text{pairing}(p)(y) = p(\text{slice}(y)), where slice(y)\text{slice}(y) is the linear functional on EE defined by x↦Λ(x⊗y)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes y).

theorem

Expansion of Λ(e⊗f)\Lambda(e \otimes f) via the Bidual Decomposition of ee

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces (specifically order-unit spaces), and let Λ:E⊗F→R\Lambda: E \otimes F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is positive on the minimal tensor cone. Suppose an element e∈Ee \in E has its canonical image in the bidual E∗∗E^{**} decomposed as ev(e)=∑i∈Icipi+d\text{ev}(e) = \sum_{i \in I} c_i p_i + d, where II is a finite index set, pi∈E∗∗p_i \in E^{**} are non-negative elements (pi≥0p_i \ge 0), ci∈Rc_i \in \mathbb{R} are coefficients, and d∈E∗∗d \in E^{**} is a remainder. For any f∈Ff \in F and any N∈RN \in \mathbb{R} such that N≥0N \ge 0 and f+N⋅1≥0f + N \cdot \mathbf{1} \ge 0 (where 1\mathbf{1} is the order unit), the value of Λ\Lambda on the elementary tensor e⊗fe \otimes f is given by: Λ(e⊗f)=∑i∈Ici⋅pairing(Λ,pi,f)+d(slice(Λ,f+N⋅1))−d(slice(Λ,N⋅1))\Lambda(e \otimes f) = \sum_{i \in I} c_i \cdot \text{pairing}(\Lambda, p_i, f) + d(\text{slice}(\Lambda, f + N \cdot \mathbf{1})) - d(\text{slice}(\Lambda, N \cdot \mathbf{1})) where pairing(Λ,p,f)\text{pairing}(\Lambda, p, f) is the evaluation of the bidual element pp on the positive linear functional x↦Λ(x⊗f)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes f), and slice(Λ,y)\text{slice}(\Lambda, y) is the linear functional on EE defined by x↦Λ(x⊗y)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes y) for y≥0y \ge 0.

theorem

The left slice of an element in the maximal tensor cone is non-negative

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces. If an element z∈E⊗RFz \in E \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F belongs to the maximal tensor cone, then for any positive linear functional ϕ:E→R\phi : E \to \mathbb{R}, the left slice of zz by ϕ\phi is non-negative in FF. That is, 0≤lslice ϕ(z)0 \le \text{lslice } \phi(z).

theorem

The Measured-and-Prepared Part of Λ(z)\Lambda(z) is Non-negative

Let EE and FF be ordered real vector spaces, and let Λ:E⊗RF→R\Lambda: E \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F \to \mathbb{R} be a linear functional that is non-negative on the minimal tensor cone. Let z=∑k=1nek⊗fkz = \sum_{k=1}^n e_k \otimes f_k be an element of the maximal tensor cone of E⊗RFE \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F. Given any finite collection of non-negative elements {pi}i=1m\{p_i\}_{i=1}^m in the bidual space E∗∗E^{**} and any finite collection of positive linear functionals {ϕi}i=1m\{\phi_i\}_{i=1}^m on EE, the "measured-and-prepared" sum is non-negative: ∑k=1n∑i=1mϕi(ek)⋅pairing(Λ,pi,fk)≥0\sum_{k=1}^n \sum_{i=1}^m \phi_i(e_k) \cdot \text{pairing}(\Lambda, p_i, f_k) \ge 0 where pairing(Λ,pi,fk)\text{pairing}(\Lambda, p_i, f_k) is the value at fkf_k of the functional on FF induced by pip_i and Λ\Lambda (specifically, the evaluation of pip_i on the functional x↦Λ(x⊗fk)x \mapsto \Lambda(x \otimes f_k)), and ϕi(ek)\phi_i(e_k) is the evaluation of eke_k under the functional ϕi\phi_i.

theorem

Lower Bound for Bidual Evaluation Differences of Remainders

Let EE be an order-unit space and Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E) its bidual space. Let 11 denote the order unit in Bidual(E)\text{Bidual}(E). For any element d∈Bidual(E)d \in \text{Bidual}(E) and real number η\eta such that −η⋅1≤d≤η⋅1-\eta \cdot 1 \le d \le \eta \cdot 1, and for any two positive linear functionals ψ1,ψ2\psi_1, \psi_2 on EE, the difference in the evaluations of dd on these functionals is bounded below by: d(ψ1)−d(ψ2)≥−η(ψ1(1)+ψ2(1)) d(\psi_1) - d(\psi_2) \ge -\eta (\psi_1(1) + \psi_2(1)) where ψ(1)\psi(1) denotes the weight (evaluation) of the functional ψ\psi on the order unit 1∈E1 \in E.

theorem

Functionals Nonnegative on the Minimal Tensor Cone are Nonnegative on the Maximal Tensor Cone for Classical Systems

Let EE be a classical physical system and FF be an ordered real vector space. Let Λ\Lambda be a linear functional on the tensor product E⊗RFE \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F that is nonnegative on the minimal tensor cone (the cone generated by elementary tensors x⊗yx \otimes y where x∈Ex \in E and y∈Fy \in F are nonnegative). If zz is an element of the maximal tensor cone of E⊗RFE \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} F, then it holds that Λ(z)≥0\Lambda(z) \ge 0.

theorem

Classicality of EE implies EE is Nuclear (Namioka–Phelps Theorem)

If the positive functionals on a physical system EE form a lattice (i.e., EE is a classical system), then EE is nuclear. This means that for any Archimedean system FF, the composition of EE and FF is unique in the sense that every composite observable in the maximal tensor cone lies in the closure of the minimal tensor cone.

theorem

Namioka–Phelps Theorem: EE is Classical   ⟺  \iff EE is Nuclear

An Archimedean order-unit space EE is classical—meaning its state space is a Choquet simplex and its positive functionals form a lattice—if and only if it is nuclear, meaning that for any other Archimedean system, the minimal and maximal tensor cones coincide (it composes uniquely).