Physlib

PhyslibAlpha.AlgebraicFramework.JordanOrderUnit.Compatibility

Jordan-intrinsic compatibility of observables

i. Overview

The physical notion of two observables being "compatible" (jointly measurable, simultaneously sharp) should not need the C⋆-commutator to state — that commutator does not exist at the bare Jordan level, and defining compatibility via it would put the cart before the horse (compatibility is exactly the *classical*, commuting fragment of the theory, the fragment that should not need the full C⋆ apparatus to talk about). The standard Jordan-algebraic substitute is **operator commutativity**: `a` and `b` are Jordan-compatible when their multiplication operators commute, `L_a ∘ L_b = L_b ∘ L_a`.

`CStarAlgebra/JordanCompatibility.lean` shows this is no idle abstraction: for `a`, `b` self-adjoint elements of a C⋆-algebra that already commute in the ordinary associative sense (`ab = ba`), `L_a` and `L_b` commute as Jordan operators too — so every associatively-compatible pair of observables is automatically Jordan-compatible, recovering the expected physics. The converse (Jordan compatibility implies associative commutativity) is *not* claimed here; it is a separate, harder question left open.

A genuinely stronger notion — that `a` and `b` *jointly generate an associative Jordan subalgebra*, giving a two-observable joint functional calculus — needs a two-generator analogue of `Power/GeneratedByOne.lean` and, in turn, a two-variable strengthening of `Power/Associative.lean`'s open power-associativity theorem. `FreeJordanTwo.lean`/ `FreeSpecialTwo.lean` lay the groundwork (the abstract and concrete special free Jordan algebras on two generators), but the two hard theorems connecting them — Shirshov (the abstract algebra embeds specially) and Cohn (every quotient of a special algebra stays special) — are real, disconnected future work, not attempted here.

ii. Key definitions and results

  • `IsJordanOrderUnit.IsJordanCompatible`
  • `IsJordanOrderUnit.isJordanCompatible_comm`, `.isJordanCompatible_one_left/right`

iii. Table of contents

  • A. The compatibility predicate

A. The compatibility predicate

6 declarations

definition

aa and bb are Jordan-compatible

Two elements aa and bb of a Jordan algebra EE are Jordan-compatible if their left multiplication operators LaL_a and LbL_b commute, such that La∘Lb=Lb∘LaL_a \circ L_b = L_b \circ L_a. Here, LxL_x denotes the operator defined by Lx(y)=x∘yL_x(y) = x \circ y, where ∘\circ is the Jordan product.

theorem

aa is Jordan-compatible with aa

In a Jordan algebra EE, every element a∈Ea \in E is Jordan-compatible with itself. This means that the left multiplication operator LaL_a (defined by La(x)=a∘xL_a(x) = a \circ x, where ∘\circ is the Jordan product) commutes with itself, i.e., La∘La=La∘LaL_a \circ L_a = L_a \circ L_a.

theorem

Jordan compatibility is symmetric

Let EE be a Jordan algebra. For any elements a,b∈Ea, b \in E, if aa and bb are Jordan-compatible, then bb and aa are also Jordan-compatible. Here, aa and bb are Jordan-compatible if their left multiplication operators LaL_a and LbL_b commute (La∘Lb=Lb∘LaL_a \circ L_b = L_b \circ L_a), where Lx(y)=x∘yL_x(y) = x \circ y is the Jordan product.

theorem

The multiplication operator L1L_1 is the identity map idE\text{id}_E

In a Jordan algebra EE over the real numbers R\mathbb{R} with identity element 11, the linear operator L1L_1 representing left-multiplication by 11 is equal to the identity operator idE\text{id}_E.

theorem

11 is Jordan-compatible with any aa

In a Jordan algebra EE with identity element 11, the identity element is Jordan-compatible with any element a∈Ea \in E. This means that their left multiplication operators L1L_1 and LaL_a commute, such that L1∘La=La∘L1L_1 \circ L_a = L_a \circ L_1. Since L1L_1 is the identity operator on EE, this condition is satisfied for all aa.

theorem

aa is Jordan-compatible with 11

For any element aa in a Jordan algebra EE with identity element 11, the element aa is Jordan-compatible with 11.