Physlib

Physlib.QFT.QED.AnomalyCancellation.Permutations

Permutations of Pure U(1) ACC

We define the permutation group action on the charges of the Pure U(1) ACC system. We further define the action on the ACC System.

31 declarations

definition

Permutation group of nn fermions (SnS_n)

For a given natural number nn, the permutation group of nn fermions is defined as the symmetric group SnS_n, which consists of all permutations (bijections) of the set {0,1,…,n−1}\{0, 1, \dots, n-1\}.

instance

Group structure on PermGroup n\text{PermGroup } n

For any natural number nn, the set of permutations of nn fermions, denoted by PermGroup n\text{PermGroup } n (mathematically the symmetric group SnS_n), is equipped with a group structure where the group operation is the composition of permutations.

definition

Q\mathbb{Q}-linear map of the permutation ff on charges S∈QnS \in \mathbb{Q}^n

For a given natural number nn and a permutation f∈Snf \in S_n (representing an element of `PermGroup n`), this definition provides the Q\mathbb{Q}-linear map from the space of charges Qn\mathbb{Q}^n to itself that acts by permuting the indices. For any charge configuration S:{0,1,…,n−1}→QS: \{0, 1, \dots, n-1\} \to \mathbb{Q}, the map sends SS to the composition S∘fS \circ f.

definition

Representation of the permutation group SnS_n on the space of charges Qn\mathbb{Q}^n

For a given natural number nn, this definition constructs the group representation of the symmetric group SnS_n (representing the permutations of nn fermions) on the Q\mathbb{Q}-vector space of rational charges Qn\mathbb{Q}^n. The representation maps each permutation f∈Snf \in S_n to a Q\mathbb{Q}-linear automorphism of the charge space, where the action on a charge configuration S∈QnS \in \mathbb{Q}^n is given by the composition S∘f−1S \circ f^{-1}.

theorem

Permutation Invariance of the Gravitational Anomaly Cancellation Condition

For a given natural number nn, let f∈Snf \in S_n be a permutation in the permutation group of nn fermions, and let S∈QnS \in \mathbb{Q}^n be a configuration of rational charges. The gravitational anomaly cancellation (ACC) function for a Pure U(1)U(1) system, denoted by accGravn\text{accGrav}_n, is invariant under the permutation of charges: accGravn(f⋅S)=accGravn(S),\text{accGrav}_n(f \cdot S) = \text{accGrav}_n(S), where f⋅Sf \cdot S denotes the action of the permutation ff on the charge vector SS.

theorem

Permutation Invariance of the Cubic Anomaly Sum accCube\text{accCube}

For a pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system with nn fermions, let S∈QnS \in \mathbb{Q}^n be the vector of rational charges and let f∈Snf \in S_n be a permutation of the fermions (an element of the permutation group PermGroup n\text{PermGroup } n). The cubic anomaly cancellation condition, denoted by accCube\text{accCube}, is invariant under the permutation of charges, such that accCube(f⋅S)=accCube(S)\text{accCube}(f \cdot S) = \text{accCube}(S), where f⋅Sf \cdot S represents the action of the permutation on the charge configuration.

definition

Group action of SnS_n on the Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system

For a given natural number nn, this definition defines a group action of the permutation group SnS_n on the Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system (ACC system) consisting of nn fermions. The action is defined by the representation of SnS_n on the space of rational charges Qn\mathbb{Q}^n, where a permutation f∈Snf \in S_n acts on a charge configuration SS by permuting its components. This group action preserves the anomaly cancellation conditions of the system, specifically the linear gravitational anomaly cancellation condition ∑i=0n−1Si=0\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} S_i = 0 and the cubic anomaly cancellation condition ∑i=0n−1Si3=0\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} S_i^3 = 0.

theorem

The permutation action on charges satisfies (f⋅S)i=Sf−1(i)(f \cdot S)_i = S_{f^{-1}(i)}

Consider a pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system with nn fermions. Let S∈QnS \in \mathbb{Q}^n be the configuration of rational charges, where SiS_i denotes the charge of the ii-th fermion for i∈{0,…,n−1}i \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f∈Snf \in S_n be an element of the permutation group acting on the system. The group action of ff on the charge configuration SS, denoted by f⋅Sf \cdot S, results in a new configuration whose ii-th component is given by (f⋅S)i=Sf−1(i)(f \cdot S)_i = S_{f^{-1}(i)}.

theorem

The ii-th component of a permuted linear ACC solution is Sf−1(i)S_{f^{-1}(i)}

Let nn be a natural number and let SS be a solution to the linear anomaly cancellation conditions for the Pure U(1)U(1) system with nn fermions. For any permutation f∈Snf \in S_n, let f⋅Sf \cdot S denote the action of the permutation on the solution. Then, for any index i∈{0,…,n−1}i \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}, the ii-th component of the permuted solution is equal to the component of SS at the index f−1(i)f^{-1}(i). That is, (f⋅S)i=Sf−1(i)(f \cdot S)_i = S_{f^{-1}(i)}.

definition

Permutation mapping the image of gg to the image of ff

Given two injections f,g:{0,…,m−1}↪{0,…,n−1}f, g: \{0, \dots, m-1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\}, which represent two ordered subsets of mm fermions within a system of nn fermions, this definition constructs a permutation σ\sigma of the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\} (an element of the group SnS_n associated with `FamilyPermutations n`). This permutation σ\sigma is defined such that it maps each index g(i)g(i) to the index f(i)f(i) for all i∈{0,…,m−1}i \in \{0, \dots, m-1\}, effectively moving the ordered subset defined by gg to the ordered subset defined by ff.

definition

Embedding of {0,1}\{0, 1\} into Fin n\text{Fin } n mapping to ii and jj

Given two distinct indices i,ji, j in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}, this definition provides an embedding f:{0,1}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} such that f(0)=if(0) = i and f(1)=jf(1) = j.

theorem

i∈range(permTwoInj i,j)i \in \text{range}(\text{permTwoInj } i, j)

For any distinct indices i,j∈{0,…,n−1}i, j \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}, let f:{0,1}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (defined as `permTwoInj`) such that f(0)=if(0) = i and f(1)=jf(1) = j. Then ii is contained in the range of ff.

theorem

The inverse of the embedding mapping {0,1}\{0, 1\} to {i,j}\{i, j\} sends ii to 00

Let ii and jj be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (defined as `permTwoInj`) such that f(0)=if(0) = i and f(1)=jf(1) = j. Let ϕ:{0,1}≃range(f)\phi: \{0, 1\} \simeq \text{range}(f) be the equivalence mapping each element in the domain {0,1}\{0, 1\} to its image under ff. Then the inverse of this equivalence applied to ii equals 00, i.e., ϕ−1(i)=0\phi^{-1}(i) = 0.

theorem

j∈range(permTwoInj hij)j \in \text{range}(\text{permTwoInj } h_{ij})

Let i,ji, j be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (defined as `permTwoInj`) that maps 00 to ii and 11 to jj. Then jj is an element of the range of ff.

theorem

The inverse of the embedding mapping {0,1}\{0, 1\} to {i,j}\{i, j\} sends jj to 11

Let i,ji, j be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (defined as `permTwoInj`) such that f(0)=if(0) = i and f(1)=jf(1) = j. Let ϕ:{0,1}≃range(f)\phi: \{0, 1\} \simeq \text{range}(f) be the equivalence mapping each element in the domain to its image under ff. Then the inverse of this equivalence applied to jj equals 11, i.e., ϕ−1(j)=1\phi^{-1}(j) = 1.

definition

Permutation σ∈Sn\sigma \in S_n mapping i′↦ii' \mapsto i and j′↦jj' \mapsto j

Given two pairs of distinct indices (i,j)(i, j) and (i′,j′)(i', j') in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}, this definition constructs a permutation σ\sigma in the symmetric group SnS_n (the group action `FamilyPermutations n` on the Pure U(1)U(1) ACC system). This permutation is defined such that it maps i′i' to ii and j′j' to jj (i.e., σ(i′)=i\sigma(i') = i and σ(j′)=j\sigma(j') = j). It is constructed by composing the injection mapping {0,1}→{i,j}\{0, 1\} \to \{i, j\} with the inverse of the injection mapping {0,1}→{i′,j′}\{0, 1\} \to \{i', j'\} and extending this to a full permutation of {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}.

theorem

The Permutation `permTwo` Maps i′i' to ii

Let i,ji, j and i′,j′i', j' be pairs of distinct indices in the set of indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let σ\sigma be the permutation in the symmetric group SnS_n (associated with the group action on the Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system) constructed to map the pair (i′,j′)(i', j') to (i,j)(i, j). Then the image of i′i' under this permutation is ii, i.e., σ(i′)=i\sigma(i') = i.

theorem

The Permutation `permTwo` Maps j′j' to jj

Let i,ji, j and i′,j′i', j' be pairs of distinct indices in the set of indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let σ\sigma be the permutation in the symmetric group SnS_n defined by `permTwo` that maps the pair (i′,j′)(i', j') to (i,j)(i, j). Then the value of this permutation at j′j' is jj, i.e., σ(j′)=j\sigma(j') = j.

definition

Embedding of Fin 3\text{Fin } 3 into Fin n\text{Fin } n mapping to i,j,ki, j, k

Given three distinct indices i,j,ki, j, k in the set of indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\} (represented by Fin n\text{Fin } n), this definition constructs an embedding (an injective function) f:Fin 3↪Fin nf: \text{Fin } 3 \hookrightarrow \text{Fin } n. The mapping is defined such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k.

theorem

ii is in the range of the embedding mapping {0,1,2}\{0, 1, 2\} to {i,j,k}\{i, j, k\}

Given distinct indices i,j,k∈{0,…,n−1}i, j, k \in \{0, \dots, n-1\} and the embedding f:{0,1,2}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1, 2\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} (defined as `permThreeInj`) that maps 0↦i0 \mapsto i, 1↦j1 \mapsto j, and 2↦k2 \mapsto k, the index ii belongs to the range of ff.

theorem

The inverse of the embedding mapping {0,1,2}\{0, 1, 2\} to {i,j,k}\{i, j, k\} sends ii to 00

Let i,j,ki, j, k be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1,2}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1, 2\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (injective function) defined such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k. Let e:{0,1,2}≅range(f)e: \{0, 1, 2\} \cong \text{range}(f) be the equivalence (bijection) induced by restricting the codomain of ff to its range. Then the inverse of this equivalence, e−1e^{-1}, maps the index ii to 00.

theorem

jj is in the range of the embedding f:Fin 3↪Fin nf: \text{Fin } 3 \hookrightarrow \text{Fin } n mapping to i,j,ki, j, k

Let i,j,ki, j, k be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1,2}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1, 2\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (injective function) defined such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k. Then jj is contained in the range of ff.

theorem

The inverse of the three-index embedding maps jj to 11

Let i,j,ki, j, k be distinct indices in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let f:{0,1,2}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1, 2\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} be the embedding (injective function) defined such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k. Let e:{0,1,2}≅range(f)e: \{0, 1, 2\} \cong \text{range}(f) be the equivalence (bijection) induced by restricting the codomain of ff to its range. Then the inverse of this equivalence, e−1e^{-1}, maps the index jj to 11.

theorem

kk is in the range of the three-index embedding

Given three distinct indices i,j,ki, j, k in the set {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\} and the injective mapping f:{0,1,2}↪{0,…,n−1}f: \{0, 1, 2\} \hookrightarrow \{0, \dots, n-1\} defined such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k, then kk is an element of the range of ff.

theorem

The inverse of the three-index embedding maps kk to 22

Given three distinct indices i,j,ki, j, k in the set of indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\} (denoted as Fin n\text{Fin } n), let f:Fin 3↪Fin nf: \text{Fin } 3 \hookrightarrow \text{Fin } n be the injective mapping (embedding) such that f(0)=if(0) = i, f(1)=jf(1) = j, and f(2)=kf(2) = k. Let E:Fin 3≃range(f)E: \text{Fin } 3 \simeq \text{range}(f) be the equivalence between the domain and the range induced by ff. The theorem states that the inverse of this equivalence, E−1E^{-1}, maps the element kk (where kk is considered as an element of the range of ff) to the index 22.

definition

Permutation mapping (i′,j′,k′)(i', j', k') to (i,j,k)(i, j, k)

For a system with nn fermions, given two sets of three distinct indices (i,j,k)(i, j, k) and (i′,j′,k′)(i', j', k') in {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}, the definition `permThree` constructs a permutation σ\sigma in the symmetric group SnS_n. This permutation is defined such that it maps the second triplet to the first triplet: σ(i′)=i\sigma(i') = i, σ(j′)=j\sigma(j') = j, and σ(k′)=k\sigma(k') = k. This permutation belongs to the group of actions defined for the Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system.

theorem

The permutation `permThree` maps i′i' to ii

Let i,j,ki, j, k and i′,j′,k′i', j', k' be two sets of three distinct indices in {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}. Let σ\sigma be the permutation in the symmetric group SnS_n (defined as `permThree`) constructed to map the triplet (i′,j′,k′)(i', j', k') to (i,j,k)(i, j, k). Then the value of the permutation applied to the first index of the second triplet is the first index of the first triplet, i.e., σ(i′)=i\sigma(i') = i.

theorem

`permThree` maps j′j' to jj

Let nn be the number of fermions in a Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system. Given two triplets of distinct indices (i,j,k)(i, j, k) and (i′,j′,k′)(i', j', k') in the set of fermion indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}, let σ\sigma be the permutation constructed to map the second triplet to the first triplet. Then, the image of the index j′j' under the permutation σ\sigma is jj.

theorem

`permThree` maps k′k' to kk

Let nn be the number of fermions in a Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system. Given two triplets of distinct indices (i,j,k)(i, j, k) and (i′,j′,k′)(i', j', k') in the set of fermion indices {0,…,n−1}\{0, \dots, n-1\}, let σ\sigma be the permutation (defined as `permThree`) constructed to map the second triplet to the first triplet. Then, the image of the index k′k' under the permutation σ\sigma is kk, i.e., σ(k′)=k\sigma(k') = k.

theorem

Permutation invariance of a property for a pair of indices implies it holds for all distinct pairs

Let SS be a solution to the linear anomaly cancellation conditions for the Pure U(1)U(1) system with nn fermions. Let PP be a property (predicate) defined on pairs of rational charges. If there exist two distinct indices a,b∈{0,…,n−1}a, b \in \{0, \dots, n-1\} such that for every permutation ff in the symmetric group SnS_n, the property PP holds for the aa-th and bb-th components of the permuted solution f⋅Sf \cdot S, then PP holds for the ii-th and jj-th components of SS for all pairs of distinct indices i,j∈{0,…,n−1}i, j \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}.

theorem

Permutation Symmetry for Properties of Triplets in Pure U(1)U(1) Linear Solutions

Let nn be a natural number, and let SS be a solution to the linear anomaly cancellation conditions for the Pure U(1)U(1) system with nn fermions. Let P:Q×(Q×Q)→PropP: \mathbb{Q} \times (\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{Q}) \to \text{Prop} be a property of triplets of rational numbers. Suppose there exist three distinct indices a,b,c∈{0,…,n−1}a, b, c \in \{0, \dots, n-1\} such that for every permutation ff in the symmetric group SnS_n, the property PP holds for the components of the permuted solution f⋅Sf \cdot S at indices a,ba, b, and cc, such that P((f⋅S)a,((f⋅S)b,(f⋅S)c))P((f \cdot S)_a, ((f \cdot S)_b, (f \cdot S)_c)) is true. Then, for any triplet of distinct indices i,j,k∈{0,…,n−1}i, j, k \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}, the property PP holds for the components of the original solution SS at those indices, i.e., P(Si,(Sj,Sk))P(S_i, (S_j, S_k)) is true.