PhyslibSearch

Physlib.QFT.QED.AnomalyCancellation.LineInPlaneCond

11 declarations

definition

Line-in-plane condition for a triple (s1,s2,s3)(s_1, s_2, s_3)

#LineInPlaneProp

For a triple of rational numbers (s1,s2,s3)Q3(s_1, s_2, s_3) \in \mathbb{Q}^3, this proposition is satisfied if s1=s2s_1 = s_2, s1=s2s_1 = -s_2, or 2s3+s1+s2=02s_3 + s_1 + s_2 = 0.

definition

Line-in-plane condition for a solution SS

#LineInPlaneCond

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn1)QnS = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n-1}) \in \mathbb{Q}^n be a linear solution. The condition `LineInPlaneCond S` holds if for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n1}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}, the components of SS satisfy at least one of the following: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0

theorem

Permutation Invariance of the Line-in-Plane Condition

#lineInPlaneCond_perm

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn1)QnS = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n-1}) \in \mathbb{Q}^n be a linear solution to the Pure U(1)U(1) anomaly cancellation system. The line-in-plane condition holds for SS if for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n1}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}, at least one of the following is true: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 If SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition, then for any permutation MM in the symmetric group SnS_n, the permuted solution MSM \cdot S also satisfies the line-in-plane condition.

theorem

Line-in-plane condition implies (2n)Sn+1=(2n)Sn(2-n)S_{n+1} = -(2-n)S_n if Sn2Sn+12S_n^2 \neq S_{n+1}^2

#lineInPlaneCond_eq_last'

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn+1)S = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n+1}) be a linear solution of n+2n+2 rational components satisfying the line-in-plane condition. The line-in-plane condition states that for any three pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n+1}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n+1\}, at least one of the following holds: Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2}, Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2}, or 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0. If the squares of the last two components are not equal, Sn2Sn+12S_n^2 \neq S_{n+1}^2, then the components SnS_n and Sn+1S_{n+1} satisfy (2n)Sn+1=(2n)Sn(2-n)S_{n+1} = -(2-n)S_n.

theorem

Line-in-plane condition implies Sn+3=Sn+4|S_{n+3}| = |S_{n+4}|

#lineInPlaneCond_eq_last

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn+4)S = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n+4}) be a linear solution with n+5n+5 rational components satisfying the line-in-plane condition. The line-in-plane condition holds if for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n+4}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n+4\}, at least one of the following is satisfied: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then the last two components of the solution have the same absolute value, i.e., Sn+3=Sn+4|S_{n+3}| = |S_{n+4}|.

theorem

The line-in-plane condition implies Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for all i,ji, j in solutions with n5n \ge 5 components

#linesInPlane_eq_sq

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn+4)S = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n+4}) be a solution to the linear anomaly cancellation conditions for the Pure U(1)U(1) system with n+5n+5 fermions. Suppose SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition, which states that for any three pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n+4}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n+4\}, at least one of the following holds: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then, for every pair of distinct indices i,j{0,,n+4}i, j \in \{0, \dots, n+4\}, the components of the solution have equal absolute values, i.e., Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j|.

theorem

The line-in-plane condition implies Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for n5n \ge 5 components

#linesInPlane_constAbs

Let S=(S0,S1,,Sn+4)S = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{n+4}) be a linear solution to the pure U(1)U(1) anomaly equations with n+5n+5 components (where nn is a natural number). Suppose SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition, which states that for any three pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,n+4}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, n+4\}, at least one of the following holds: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then the solution SS satisfies the constant absolute value condition, meaning Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for all i,j{0,,n+4}i, j \in \{0, \dots, n+4\}.

theorem

The line-in-plane condition implies S0=S1|S_0| = |S_1| for n=4n=4 solutions

#linesInPlane_four

Let S=(S0,S1,S2,S3)Q4S = (S_0, S_1, S_2, S_3) \in \mathbb{Q}^4 be a solution to the pure U(1)U(1) anomaly equations for n=4n=4. If SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition—meaning that for any distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,1,2,3}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, either Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2}, Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2}, or 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0—then the first two components of the solution have equal absolute values, S0=S1|S_0| = |S_1|.

theorem

For n=4n=4, the line-in-plane condition implies Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for all iji \neq j

#linesInPlane_eq_sq_four

Let S=(S0,S1,S2,S3)Q4S = (S_0, S_1, S_2, S_3) \in \mathbb{Q}^4 be a solution to the pure U(1)U(1) anomaly equations for n=4n=4, such that i=03Si=0\sum_{i=0}^3 S_i = 0 and i=03Si3=0\sum_{i=0}^3 S_i^3 = 0. Suppose SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition: for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,1,2,3}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, at least one of the following holds: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then for all pairs of distinct indices i,j{0,1,2,3}i, j \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, the components of the solution have equal absolute values, Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j|.

theorem

Line-in-plane condition implies Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for n=4n=4 solutions

#linesInPlane_constAbs_four

Let S=(S0,S1,S2,S3)S = (S_0, S_1, S_2, S_3) be a solution to the n=4n=4 pure U(1)U(1) anomaly equations, such that i=03Si=0\sum_{i=0}^3 S_i = 0 and i=03Si3=0\sum_{i=0}^3 S_i^3 = 0. Suppose SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition: for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,1,2,3}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, at least one of the following holds: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then the solution SS has constant absolute value, meaning Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for all i,j{0,1,2,3}i, j \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}.

theorem

For n4n \ge 4, the line-in-plane condition implies Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for pure U(1)U(1) solutions

#linesInPlane_constAbs_AF

Let N=n+4N = n + 4 for some natural number nn (such that N4N \ge 4). Let S=(S0,S1,,SN1)S = (S_0, S_1, \dots, S_{N-1}) be a solution to the pure U(1)U(1) anomaly equations, satisfying i=0N1Si=0\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} S_i = 0 and i=0N1Si3=0\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} S_i^3 = 0. Suppose SS satisfies the line-in-plane condition, which states that for every triple of pairwise distinct indices i1,i2,i3{0,,N1}i_1, i_2, i_3 \in \{0, \dots, N-1\}, at least one of the following holds: - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = S_{i_2} - Si1=Si2S_{i_1} = -S_{i_2} - 2Si3+Si1+Si2=02S_{i_3} + S_{i_1} + S_{i_2} = 0 Then the solution SS has constant absolute value, meaning Si=Sj|S_i| = |S_j| for all i,j{0,,N1}i, j \in \{0, \dots, N-1\}.