Physlib

Physlib.Mathematics.Groups.SpecialUnitary.LieAlgebra.Adjoint

The adjoint representation of `SU(n)`

The adjoint representation of `SU(n)` and its complexification, defined as `x ↦ g x g†`.

i. Overview

We define the adjont representation of `SU(n)` on its Lie algebra `su(n)` and its complexification. The adjoint is defined by conjugation, `x ↦ g x g†`. It preserves the bracket, and its kernel is the centre of `SU(n)`, the scalar matrices (A).

The contraction `adjointContr` of two real adjoint indices is the trace form `x ⊗ y ↦ tr (x y)` on `su(n)`, which is real since `x` and `y` are hermitian, and invariant under the adjoint action by the cyclicity of the trace. It is symmetric, invariant under the bracket, and positive definite since `tr (x x) = tr (x x†)` vanishes only for `x = 0` (B.1).

The contraction `adjointℂContr` of two complex adjoint indices is its complexification. On the underlying matrices it is the trace form `A ⊗ B ↦ tr (A B)`, and it is again symmetric, invariant under the bracket and nondegenerate (B.2).

ii. Key results

  • `SULieAlgebra.adjoint` : the adjoint representation on `su(n)`.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjointℂ` : the adjoint representation on the complexification.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjoint_eq_iff` : the adjoint representation is faithful modulo the centre.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjointContr` : the contraction of two real adjoint indices.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjointℂContr` : the contraction of two complex adjoint indices.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjointContr_self_pos` : the real contraction is positive definite.
  • `SULieAlgebra.adjointℂContr_nondegenerate` : the complex contraction is nondegenerate.

iii. Table of contents

- A. The adjoint representation - A.1. The real adjoint representation - A.2. The complex adjoint representation - B. The contraction of adjoint indices - B.1. The real case - B.2. The complex case

iv. References

* None.

A. The adjoint representation

A.1. The real adjoint representation

A.2. The complex adjoint representation

B. The contraction of adjoint indices

B.1. The real case

B.2. The complex case

38 declarations

definition

Adjoint representation of SU(n)SU(n) on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

For a natural number nn, the adjoint representation of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) on its real Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is the group representation where an element g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) acts on x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n) via conjugation. Specifically, the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is the space of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian, and the action is given by x↦gxg†x \mapsto g x g^\dagger, where g†g^\dagger denotes the conjugate transpose of gg.

theorem

The Adjoint Action of SU(n)SU(n) is Matrix Conjugation gxg†g x g^\dagger

For any natural number nn, let gg be an element of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) and xx be an element of the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) (consisting of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices). The matrix corresponding to the adjoint action of gg on xx is given by gxg†g x g^\dagger, where g†g^\dagger denotes the conjugate transpose of gg.

theorem

The Adjoint Action of SU(n)SU(n) Preserves the Lie Bracket on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

For any element gg of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) and any x,yx, y in the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n), the adjoint representation AdgAd_g preserves the Lie bracket [⋅,⋅][\cdot, \cdot], satisfying the identity: Adg([x,y])=[Adg(x),Adg(y)]Ad_g([x, y]) = [Ad_g(x), Ad_g(y)] where Adg(x)=gxg†Ad_g(x) = g x g^\dagger is the action by conjugation and the Lie bracket on the space of traceless hermitian matrices is defined as [x,y]=i(xy−yx)[x, y] = i(xy - yx).

theorem

The adjoint representation of g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) is trivial iff gg is a scalar matrix

For any natural number nn and any element gg of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n), the adjoint representation of gg on the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is the identity operator if and only if there exists a complex scalar c∈Cc \in \mathbb{C} such that the matrix representation of gg is cInc I_n, where InI_n is the n×nn \times n identity matrix. In other words, the kernel of the adjoint representation Ad:SU(n)→Aut(su(n))\text{Ad} : SU(n) \to \text{Aut}(\mathfrak{su}(n)) consists exactly of the scalar matrices in SU(n)SU(n).

theorem

Adg=Adh  ⟺  ∃c∈C,g=ch\text{Ad}_g = \text{Ad}_h \iff \exists c \in \mathbb{C}, g = c h for g,h∈SU(n)g, h \in SU(n)

Let SU(n)SU(n) be the special unitary group and su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be its Lie algebra of traceless hermitian matrices. For any two elements g,h∈SU(n)g, h \in SU(n), their adjoint actions on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) are equal if and only if there exists a complex scalar c∈Cc \in \mathbb{C} such that g=chg = c h as matrices. This implies that the adjoint representation is faithful on SU(n)SU(n) modulo its center.

definition

Complexified adjoint representation of SU(n)SU(n)

For a natural number nn, the complexified adjoint representation of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) is a representation over the field C\mathbb{C} acting on the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n). It is defined by extending the real adjoint representation on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) (where an element g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) acts on x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n) via conjugation gxg†g x g^\dagger) to its complexification via base change. Specifically, for g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n), its action on a tensor z⊗x∈C⊗Rsu(n)z \otimes x \in \mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) is given by z⊗(gxg†)z \otimes (g x g^\dagger).

theorem

AdgC(z⊗x)=z⊗Adg(x)\text{Ad}_g^{\mathbb{C}}(z \otimes x) = z \otimes \text{Ad}_g(x)

Let nn be a natural number, g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) be an element of the special unitary group, z∈Cz \in \mathbb{C} be a complex scalar, and x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n) be an element of the Lie algebra of traceless hermitian matrices. The action of the complexified adjoint representation AdgC\text{Ad}_g^{\mathbb{C}} on the pure tensor z⊗xz \otimes x in the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) is given by AdgC(z⊗x)=z⊗Adg(x),\text{Ad}_g^{\mathbb{C}}(z \otimes x) = z \otimes \text{Ad}_g(x), where Adg\text{Ad}_g denotes the adjoint representation of SU(n)SU(n) on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n).

theorem

The complex adjoint action of SU(n)SU(n) preserves the Lie bracket

For any element gg of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) and any elements A,BA, B in the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n), the complexified adjoint representation Adg\text{Ad}_g preserves the Lie bracket, such that: Adg([A,B])=[Adg(A),Adg(B)]\text{Ad}_g([A, B]) = [\text{Ad}_g(A), \text{Ad}_g(B)] where [⋅,⋅][\cdot, \cdot] denotes the Lie bracket on the complexified Lie algebra.

theorem

AdC(g)=id  ⟺  g=cI\text{Ad}_{\mathbb{C}}(g) = \text{id} \iff g = c I for g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n)

Let nn be a natural number and gg be an element of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n). The complexified adjoint representation AdC(g)\text{Ad}_{\mathbb{C}}(g) is the identity map if and only if gg is a scalar matrix, meaning there exists a complex number c∈Cc \in \mathbb{C} such that g=cIng = c I_n, where InI_n is the n×nn \times n identity matrix.

theorem

AdgC=AdhC  ⟺  ∃c∈C,g=ch\text{Ad}^\mathbb{C}_g = \text{Ad}^\mathbb{C}_h \iff \exists c \in \mathbb{C}, g = ch for g,h∈SU(n)g, h \in SU(n)

For any two elements g,hg, h of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n), their complexified adjoint actions are equal if and only if there exists a complex scalar c∈Cc \in \mathbb{C} such that g=chg = ch as matrices. Here, the complexified adjoint representation acts on the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) via the extension of the conjugation map x↦gxg†x \mapsto g x g^\dagger.

theorem

The complexified adjoint action of SU(n)SU(n) is matrix conjugation

Let gg be an element of the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) and AA be an element of the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n). The matrix representation of the complexified adjoint action of gg on AA is given by the conjugation gMg†g M g^\dagger, where MM is the matrix corresponding to AA and g†g^\dagger is the conjugate transpose of gg.

theorem

Adjoint Action of a Diagonal Matrix g=diag⁡(d)g = \operatorname{diag}(d) Scales Matrix Entries by dxdy‾d_x \overline{d_y}

Let g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) be a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries di∈Cd_i \in \mathbb{C} for i∈{1,…,n}i \in \{1, \dots, n\}. For any element AA in the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the (x,y)(x, y)-entry of the matrix resulting from the adjoint action of gg on AA is given by (g⋅A)xy=dxdy‾Axy(g \cdot A)_{xy} = d_x \overline{d_y} A_{xy} where AxyA_{xy} denotes the (x,y)(x, y)-entry of AA and dy‾\overline{d_y} is the complex conjugate of dyd_y.

theorem

Trace Invariance under the Complexified Adjoint Representation of SU(n)SU(n)

Let SU(n)SU(n) be the special unitary group and su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} be the complexification of the Lie algebra of traceless hermitian matrices. For any g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) and any element A∈su(n)CA \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the trace of the matrix representing the adjoint action of gg on AA is equal to the trace of the matrix representing AA: Tr(AdgA)=Tr(A)\text{Tr}(\text{Ad}_g A) = \text{Tr}(A) where AdgA\text{Ad}_g A is defined by the conjugation gAg†gAg^{\dagger}.

definition

Invariant trace form x⊗y↦Tr(xy)x \otimes y \mapsto \text{Tr}(xy) on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices over C\mathbb{C}. The map `adjointContr` is the invariant bilinear form defined as an intertwining map from the tensor product of the adjoint representation of SU(n)SU(n) with itself to the trivial representation R\mathbb{R}. For elements x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the contraction is given by the real part of the trace of their product, i.e., x⊗y↦Re(Tr(xy))x \otimes y \mapsto \text{Re}(\text{Tr}(xy)). Since xx and yy are hermitian matrices, Tr(xy)\text{Tr}(xy) is always real, and the map corresponds to the standard trace form on the Lie algebra.

theorem

adjointContr(x⊗y)=Re(Tr(xy))\text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y) = \text{Re}(\text{Tr}(xy)) for x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n)

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. For any two elements x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the invariant bilinear form adjointContr\text{adjointContr} evaluated on their tensor product x⊗yx \otimes y is equal to the real part of the trace of the matrix product xyxy: adjointContr(x⊗y)=Re(Tr(xy))\text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y) = \text{Re}(\text{Tr}(xy))

theorem

Adjoint Action of SU(n)SU(n) Preserves the Real Contraction on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

For any natural number nn, let g∈SU(n)g \in SU(n) be an element of the special unitary group and x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n) be elements of its Lie algebra of traceless hermitian matrices. The adjoint representation Adg\text{Ad}_g preserves the real contraction (invariant trace form) adjointContr\text{adjointContr}, such that: adjointContr(Adgx⊗Adgy)=adjointContr(x⊗y) \text{adjointContr}(\text{Ad}_g x \otimes \text{Ad}_g y) = \text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y) where the adjoint action is given by conjugation x↦gxg†x \mapsto g x g^\dagger.

theorem

Tr(xy)=adjointContr(x,y)\text{Tr}(xy) = \text{adjointContr}(x, y) for x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n)

For any natural number nn and any two elements x,yx, y in the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) (the space of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices), the complex trace of the product of their underlying matrices, Tr(xy)\text{Tr}(xy), is equal to their real-valued contraction adjointContr(x,y)\text{adjointContr}(x, y). This reflects the fact that the trace of the product of two hermitian matrices is always real.

theorem

adjointContr(x⊗y)=adjointContr(y⊗x)\text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y) = \text{adjointContr}(y \otimes x)

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. For any x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the adjoint contraction map adjointContr\text{adjointContr} (the invariant trace form x⊗y↦Tr(xy)x \otimes y \mapsto \text{Tr}(xy)) is symmetric, such that adjointContr(x⊗y)=adjointContr(y⊗x)\text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y) = \text{adjointContr}(y \otimes x).

theorem

adjointContr(⌊x,y⌋⊗z)=adjointContr(x⊗⌊y,z⌋)\text{adjointContr}(\lfloor x, y \rfloor \otimes z) = \text{adjointContr}(x \otimes \lfloor y, z \rfloor) in su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices. For any x,y,z∈su(n)x, y, z \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the real invariant trace form `adjointContr` (the bilinear form defined by the trace of the product of matrices) is invariant under the Lie bracket ⌊⋅,⋅⌋\lfloor \cdot, \cdot \rfloor, satisfying: adjointContr(⌊x,y⌋⊗z)=adjointContr(x⊗⌊y,z⌋)\text{adjointContr}(\lfloor x, y \rfloor \otimes z) = \text{adjointContr}(x \otimes \lfloor y, z \rfloor) In terms of the matrix trace, this is equivalent to Tr(⌊x,y⌋z)=Tr(x⌊y,z⌋)\text{Tr}(\lfloor x, y \rfloor z) = \text{Tr}(x \lfloor y, z \rfloor).

theorem

Tr(x2)≥0\text{Tr}(x^2) \ge 0 for x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n)

For any natural number nn and any xx in the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) (the space of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian complex matrices), the invariant trace form evaluated at x⊗xx \otimes x is non-negative, i.e., 0≤Tr(x2)0 \le \text{Tr}(x^2).

theorem

Tr(x2)=0  ⟺  x=0\text{Tr}(x^2) = 0 \iff x = 0 in su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. For any x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the contraction (trace form) Tr(x2)\text{Tr}(x^2) is equal to zero if and only if xx is the zero matrix.

theorem

The Trace Form on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is Positive Definite

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. For any non-zero matrix x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the invariant trace form evaluated at x⊗xx \otimes x, given by Tr(x2)\text{Tr}(x^2), is strictly positive.

theorem

∀y∈su(n),Tr(xy)=0  ⟹  x=0\forall y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), \text{Tr}(xy) = 0 \implies x = 0

For any natural number nn, let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. For any x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n), if the trace form Tr(xy)=0\text{Tr}(xy) = 0 for all y∈su(n)y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), then x=0x = 0.

theorem

Tr(xy)=0\text{Tr}(xy) = 0 for all x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n) implies y=0y = 0

Let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. Let ⟨x,y⟩=Tr(xy)\langle x, y \rangle = \text{Tr}(xy) denote the invariant trace form on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n). If an element y∈su(n)y \in \mathfrak{su}(n) satisfies Tr(xy)=0\text{Tr}(xy) = 0 for all x∈su(n)x \in \mathfrak{su}(n), then y=0y = 0.

theorem

The map y↦Tr(⋅y)y \mapsto \text{Tr}(\cdot y) on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is injective

For any natural number nn, let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are traceless and hermitian. The linear map that sends each matrix y∈su(n)y \in \mathfrak{su}(n) to the linear functional fy:su(n)→Rf_y : \mathfrak{su}(n) \to \mathbb{R} defined by fy(x)=Tr(xy)f_y(x) = \text{Tr}(xy) is injective.

theorem

The Real Contraction on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is Symmetric

For any natural number nn, let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices. The real contraction `adjointContr`, viewed as a bilinear form B:su(n)×su(n)→RB: \mathfrak{su}(n) \times \mathfrak{su}(n) \to \mathbb{R} defined by B(x,y)=Tr(xy)B(x, y) = \text{Tr}(xy), is symmetric. That is, for all x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), B(x,y)=B(y,x)B(x, y) = B(y, x).

theorem

The trace form on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) is nondegenerate

For any natural number nn, the invariant bilinear form on the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) (consisting of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices), defined by B(x,y)=Tr(xy)B(x, y) = \text{Tr}(xy), is nondegenerate.

definition

Complexified invariant trace form A⊗B↦Tr(AB)A \otimes B \mapsto \text{Tr}(AB) on su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}

The map `adjointℂContr` is an intertwining map from the tensor product of the complexified adjoint representation of SU(n)SU(n) with itself to the trivial representation over C\mathbb{C}. It is the complexification of the real invariant trace form `adjointContr`. For elements A,BA, B in the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C=C⊗Rsu(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n), the contraction is given by the trace of their product, A⊗B↦Tr(AB)A \otimes B \mapsto \text{Tr}(AB).

theorem

The Adjoint Representation of SU(n)SU(n) Preserves the Complex Contraction

For any element gg in the special unitary group SU(n)SU(n) and any elements A,BA, B in the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the complexified contraction (trace form) is invariant under the complexified adjoint representation Adg\text{Ad}_g: Tr(AdgA⊗AdgB)=Tr(A⊗B)\text{Tr}(\text{Ad}_g A \otimes \text{Ad}_g B) = \text{Tr}(A \otimes B) where Tr(A⊗B)\text{Tr}(A \otimes B) denotes the trace of the product of the matrices corresponding to AA and BB.

theorem

adjointCContr(A⊗B)=Tr(AB)\text{adjointℂContr}(A \otimes B) = \text{Tr}(AB)

For any elements AA and BB in the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the contraction adjointCContr\text{adjointℂContr} applied to their tensor product A⊗BA \otimes B is equal to the trace of the product of the matrices representing AA and BB. That is, adjointCContr(A⊗B)=Tr(AB)\text{adjointℂContr}(A \otimes B) = \text{Tr}(AB).

theorem

adjointCContr((1⊗x)⊗(1⊗y))=adjointContr(x⊗y)\text{adjointℂContr}((1 \otimes x) \otimes (1 \otimes y)) = \text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y)

For any natural number nn, let su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n) be the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices. For any x,y∈su(n)x, y \in \mathfrak{su}(n), the complexified invariant trace form adjointCContr\text{adjointℂContr} evaluated on the tensors 1⊗x1 \otimes x and 1⊗y1 \otimes y in the complexified Lie algebra C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) is equal to the real invariant trace form adjointContr\text{adjointContr} evaluated on x⊗yx \otimes y: adjointCContr((1⊗x)⊗(1⊗y))=adjointContr(x⊗y) \text{adjointℂContr}((1 \otimes x) \otimes (1 \otimes y)) = \text{adjointContr}(x \otimes y)

theorem

Symmetry of the complexified adjoint contraction: adjointCContr(A⊗B)=adjointCContr(B⊗A)\text{adjointℂContr}(A \otimes B) = \text{adjointℂContr}(B \otimes A)

Let su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} be the complexification of the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n), defined as C⊗Rsu(n)\mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n). For any two elements A,B∈su(n)CA, B \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the complexified adjoint contraction map `adjointℂContr` (which corresponds to the trace form Tr(AB)\text{Tr}(AB)) is symmetric: adjointCContr(A⊗B)=adjointCContr(B⊗A)\text{adjointℂContr}(A \otimes B) = \text{adjointℂContr}(B \otimes A)

theorem

Tr([A,B]C)=Tr(A[B,C])\text{Tr}([A, B]C) = \text{Tr}(A[B, C]) for the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}

Let nn be a natural number and su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} be the complexification of the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n). For any elements A,B,C∈su(n)CA, B, C \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the complexified trace form satisfies the invariance property under the Lie bracket: Tr([A,B]C)=Tr(A[B,C])\text{Tr}([A, B] C) = \text{Tr}(A [B, C]) where [⋅,⋅][ \cdot, \cdot ] denotes the Lie bracket on the complexified algebra.

theorem

In su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, Tr(AB)=0\text{Tr}(AB) = 0 for all BB implies A=0A = 0

For any natural number nn, let su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} denote the complexification of the Lie algebra su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n). For an element A∈su(n)CA \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, if the complexified invariant trace form Tr(AB)=0\text{Tr}(AB) = 0 for all B∈su(n)CB \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, then A=0A = 0.

theorem

The complexified trace form on su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} is right-separating

Let su(n)C=C⊗Rsu(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) be the complexification of the Lie algebra of SU(n)SU(n), consisting of n×nn \times n complex matrices that are the complexification of traceless hermitian matrices. Let the complexified trace form (contraction) be denoted by ⟨A,B⟩=Tr(AB)\langle A, B \rangle = \text{Tr}(AB). For any element B∈su(n)CB \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, if ⟨A,B⟩=0\langle A, B \rangle = 0 for all A∈su(n)CA \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, then B=0B = 0.

theorem

The map B↦(A↦Tr(AB))B \mapsto (A \mapsto \text{Tr}(AB)) is injective on su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}

In the complexified Lie algebra su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, the linear map that sends an element B∈su(n)CB \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} to the linear functional A↦Tr(AB)A \mapsto \text{Tr}(AB) (defined by the complexified trace form) is injective.

theorem

Symmetry of the complexified adjoint contraction on su(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)

Let nn be a natural number and let su(n)C=C⊗Rsu(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) be the complexification of the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices. The bilinear form B:su(n)C×su(n)C→CB: \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} \times \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} \to \mathbb{C} induced by the complex contraction `adjointℂContr` (which maps A⊗B↦Tr(AB)A \otimes B \mapsto \text{Tr}(AB)) is symmetric. That is, for all A,B∈su(n)CA, B \in \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}}, B(A,B)=B(B,A)B(A, B) = B(B, A).

theorem

The Complexified Trace Form on su(n)C\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} is Nondegenerate

Let nn be a natural number and su(n)C=C⊗Rsu(n)\mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathfrak{su}(n) be the complexification of the Lie algebra of n×nn \times n traceless hermitian matrices. The complex bilinear form B:su(n)C×su(n)C→CB: \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} \times \mathfrak{su}(n)_{\mathbb{C}} \to \mathbb{C} defined by the trace of the product of two matrices, B(A,B)=Tr(AB)B(A, B) = \text{Tr}(AB), is nondegenerate.